Guard the few levers you uniquely control: shaping the product’s feel, clarifying positioning, and nurturing relationships that change distribution. When you protect these hours, every other collaborator benefits from sharper direction, faster approvals, and less churn. Calendar them first each week, then defend them fiercely.
Pick one annoying, repeatable task and film yourself completing it, narrating every click, decision, and edge case. Convert the recording into a short checklist with links, templates, and examples. Note the expected outcome and quality bar. That clarity reduces revisions, accelerates training, and reveals automation opportunities.
Write acceptance criteria that state precisely what a finished result includes, excludes, and how it will be evaluated. Add examples of good, better, and unacceptable. Set a maximum number of revisions and a turnaround window. Guardrails reduce misunderstandings, create predictability, and protect your limited budget.






Open with goals, constraints, timelines, and known risks. Share examples of great outcomes and common traps. Ask the collaborator to paraphrase expectations and outline their first steps. Capture agreements in writing. Clarity at hour one creates speed, reduces anxiety, and eliminates costly misunderstandings before they snowball.
Begin with the collaborator watching you perform the task, then swap roles while they narrate decisions. Offer gentle corrections and note gaps to fix in the SOP. This rhythm builds confidence, surfaces hidden knowledge, and reduces dependence on any single person to keep work moving reliably.
Document what the collaborator can decide alone, what requires heads-up, and what demands explicit approval. Default toward autonomy with clear guardrails and review points. When decision rights are explicit, speed increases without chaos, accountability feels fair, and escalations become rare, timely, and grounded in shared context.